Home » Posts tagged 'SARS-CoV-2'
Tag Archives: SARS-CoV-2
Surviving COVID-19: Variables of Immune Response
By La Rissa Vasquez, Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior ‘23
Author’s Note: In this paper, I analyze autopsy reports conducted on deceased COVID-19 patients and supply a breakdown of the body’s immune response. The purpose of this paper is to provide a more generalized synopsis of how the body is affected by the virus from the onset of infection to the escalating factors that contribute to cause of death. COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 are referenced countless times throughout this paper, but they should not be used interchangeably. The name of the pathogenic virus is “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2” (SARS-CoV-2), and the name of the illness is called COVID-19 and is the common usage in forms of discussion. This paper only scratches the surface of the virus’s complexity and its effects upon the body and societies around the world.
Introduction
On December 31, 2019, the first case of the novel coronavirus was reported in Wuhan, China [1]. The first case of the virus reported in the United States was on January 22, 2020 [2]. Within 22 days, the Coronavirus had traveled across the Pacific to wreak havoc upon countries woefully unprepared. Within a year, COVID-19 has managed to bring some of the most powerful countries in the world to heel. Economies and healthcare systems across the world continue to be devastated by an adversary only 60 to 140 nanometers in diameter [3]. On February 11, 2020, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) formally identified the virus as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization classified COVID-19 as a worldwide pandemic and global health crisis [4]. As of May 2021, the CDC has confirmed that the U.S. has over 32 million cases. Healthcare systems across the nation and around the world are overwhelmed by the number of infected patients. Many of them perish due to either a lack of resources or accurate and efficient testing.
SARS-CoV-2 Viral Pathogenesis
Humans have two levels of immunity. Innate immunity is the body’s first line of contact and defense against invading pathogens. Adaptive immunity learns and remembers how to effectively target and eliminate these pathogens.
Innate Immunity
Our innate immune system is composed of barrier tissues and cells specialized for defense against pathogens [5]. Barrier tissues are the first line of defense, and inside barrier tissues reside sentinel cells, which are capable of consistently recognizing repeated exposure to pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). The sentinel cells release proinflammatory mediators like cytokines, chemokines, or histamines and circulate within the blood vessels inviting more immune cells from the surrounding tissue into the bloodstream [5]. Cells such as neutrophils or monocytes differentiate into macrophages and migrate from the bloodstream and phagocytose (eat) the pathogens. Neutrophils will undergo programmed cell death, referred to as apoptosis. Macrophages will continue to phagocytose the rest of the pathogens and restore homeostasis by consuming the dead neutrophils [5].
Infection occurs when these viral pathogens in respiratory droplets from a sneeze or a cough enter a person’s mouth, nose, or eyes and attach to the ACE-2 receptors in the nose, throat, and especially the lungs. Like any virus, SARS-CoV-2 cannot replicate on its own and instead hijacks the body’s own cellular machinery. The virus inserts its own genetic information into the host cell to produce more copies of itself until the cell bursts and dies, spreading more of the virus around the body to infect more cells [6]. Infection of the host cell consists of the following five steps: attachment, penetration, biosynthesis, maturation, and release. Once a virus binds to host receptors (attachment), it enters host cells via endocytosis or membrane fusion (penetration). Once the viral contents are released inside the host cells, viral RNA are transported by protein molecules in the host cell’s cytoplasm and travel into the nucleus for replication via the nuclear pore complex (NPC). Viral mRNA then makes viral proteins (biosynthesis). Lastly, novel viral particles are made (maturation) and released [7]. This innate immune response is not as effective against SARS-CoV-2 due to the strength of the various proteins displayed in Figure 1, an ultrastructural morphology rendering, provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Image Library on February 10 [8].
Figure 1
The SARS-CoV-2 virus contains “M (membrane), S (spike), E (envelope), and N (nucleocapsid)” proteins, which envelop the virion and act as a defensive shield [9]. The S or Spike viral surface protein, which consists of two subunits, S1 and S2, binds to the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors of the host cells [7]. The primary role of ACE2 is the breakdown of the angiotensin II (ANG II) protein into molecules that neutralize its harmful effects. ANG II is responsible for increased inflammation and death of alveolar cells in the lungs, which reduces oxygen uptake. When the S (spike) protein of SARS-CoV-2 binds to the ACE2 receptors, they inhibit ACE2 from doing its job of regulating ANG II, allowing ANG II to freely damage tissue in the lungs. These ACE2 receptors are naturally present on the surface of the lung’s epithelial cells and other organs throughout the body, but the virus’ S protein uses these receptors to penetrate the cell membrane and replicate inside host cells. The N (nucleocapsid) protein is another viral surface protein of SARS-CoV-2, which inhibits interferons (IFN1 and IFN-β) responsible for cytokine production [10]. But if the signals for regulating proinflammatory response are disrupted by the pathogen’s surface proteins, the innate immune response becomes hyperactive and self-destructive. A malfunctioning innate immune response also compromises an adequate adaptive immune response [9].
Adaptive Immunity
Adaptive immunity consists of B-cell and T-cell responses. B-cells produce antibodies to trigger an immune response, while T-cells actively target and eliminate infected cells.
B-Cell Response
The innate immune response is not particularly equipped to combat pathogens that are especially complex and vicious because the innate immune response is non-specific and will attack anything it identifies as an invader. The adaptive immune response can target pathogens more precisely and powerfully by using proteins called antibodies, which are produced by B-cell lymphocytes that bind to antigens on the surface of pathogens [5]. Adaptive immunity can more efficiently handle foreign pathogens, like a virus, because antibodies can see through the debris of proteins and dead cells left by the cytokine storm. Antibodies uniquely bind to antigens, acting as a beacon for the adaptive immune response to converge on the invading pathogen [5]. More importantly, adaptive immunity has memory and learns how to become more effective by retaining its response to pathogens so that it can be even quicker at eliminating them after repeated exposure [5]. Widespread pandemics like COVID-19 occur because of a lack of protective antibodies in populations that have never been exposed to or vaccinated against the specificity of SARS-CoV-2 [5]. Figure 2 depicts the four ways in which antibodies attack pathogens: neutralization, complement fixation, opsonization, and antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity.
Figure 2
Figure 2 – “Immunopathogenesis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)” [3].
Neutralization is the process by which antibodies immediately bind to the surface antigens of a pathogen and block their S protein from attaching to the receptors of healthy cells, thereby neutralizing the virus’ ability to attach and insert its genetic information. Complement fixation occurs when antibodies are responsible for inviting complement proteins to bind to the antigens of the pathogen. This process coats the pathogen in attack proteins that can either initiate the complement cascade leading to cell lysis, the breakdown of the cell, or it can induce the third stage, opsonization. During opsonization, proteins called opsonins bind to the invading pathogen, acting as markers for phagocytotic cells like macrophages to identify and consume the pathogen. Lastly, antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) is the process by which antibodies recognize the antigen of a pathogen and signal for natural-killer cells (NK cells) to release cytotoxic molecules which kill off the virally infected cell [5].
T-Cell Response
T-cell lymphocytes are produced by the bone marrow and mature in the thymus. They form the basis of cellular immunity because they directly attack foreign pathogens. Consequently, they are more effective than innate immune or B-cell responses at targeting intracellular pathogens like viruses [5]. Antibodies can get distracted by viral particles and proteins, so they rely on the blind T-cell lymphocytes to ignore the surrounding virus particles and eliminate the infected host cell at the source. As naive T-cells circulate the lymph nodes and spleen, they express T-cell receptors (TCR) that recognize cell surface peptides (antigens) attached to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on the surface of a specific pathogen. These surface MHC proteins tell the T-cells where to attack [5]. The dendritic cells work to activate the adaptive immune response by ingesting viral proteins and turning them into cell surface peptides that bind to MHC molecules, forming peptide-MHC complexes. The TCR of naive T-cells recognize the peptide-MHC complexes and activate the T-cell. For T-cells to become active, they also need to bind to proteins from the dendritic cell via co-simulation. They then undergo clonal expansion and differentiate into effector T-cells [5]. Effector T-cells are also referred to as cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). They travel through the body to hunt down peptide-MHC presenting pathogens and kill the infected cells by releasing cytotoxic molecules [5].
The adaptive immune response is stimulated by the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Within 1-2 weeks after infection, the B-cells produce antibodies while T-cells simultaneously increase proinflammatory cytotoxic molecules in a forceful attempt to eliminate the virus [7]. The uptick in Interleukin cytokines abbreviated as IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and so on, flood the body with proinflammatory substances, which “chronically increase the stimulation of T-cells, resulting in a cytokine storm and T-cell exhaustion” [9]. T-cell exhaustion not only means that the virus is overwhelming the body’s antibodies but also draining the strength of the T-cell’s ability to eliminate the virus at the source of infected host cells. SARS-CoV-2 is a “high-grade chronic viral infection because it decreases the responsiveness of T-cells leading to a decreased effector function and lower proliferative capacity” [9]. T-cell exhaustion is also linked to an increase in inhibitory receptors that can initiate apoptosis in T-cells. This results in the destruction of T-cells and their co-receptors, further suppressing the T-cells, as well as B-cells and NK cells, all of which are white blood cells (lymphocytes). Thus, explaining the general lymphopenia (the lack of lymphocytes) observed in severe COVID-19 cases and the increased number of cytokines [9]. Viral entry and attachment to ACE2 receptors trigger a vicious cycle of both innate and adaptive immune responses, mounting an intense attack by secreting proinflammatory substances that invite more lymphocytes to try and kill the virus. This releases more cytokines and chemokines [11]. The downregulation of the ACE2 enzyme results in a cascade of chemical reactions that lead to further inflammation and destruction of cells, weakening and damaging the body’s own immune response.
pathologies of a pandemic:
COVID-19 Autopsies
Once the SARS-CoV-2 attaches to alveolar type II cells, it propagates within the cells. Most viral particles cause apoptosis, releasing more self-replicating pulmonary toxins. Figure 3 displays normal ACE2 receptors located in the type II pneumocytes. Healthy alveoli are unobstructed to allow efficient diffusion of oxygen and carbon dioxide with red blood cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3 – “Type I pneumocytes are very thin in order to mediate gas exchange with the bloodstream (via diffusion). Type II pneumocytes secrete a pulmonary surfactant in order to reduce the surface tension within the alveoli” [12].
In contrast to Figure 3, Figure 4 shows the histopathology of alveolar damage (A) and inflammation (B) of the epithelial cells. As the epithelial cells detach from the alveolar wall the alveoli structures collapse and no longer inflate making it hard for patients with severe cases of COVID to breathe [13]. This results in diffuse alveolar damage with fibrin rich hyaline membranes and hemorrhages in the lungs [13]. The histopathology also detected multinucleated cells that lead to pulmonary fibrosis (scarring in the lungs). Infected cells are “abnormally large and often polynucleated cells showing a large cytoplasm with intense staining for the COVID-19 RNA probe” [13]. The viral Spike protein is also largely detected in the histopathology of COVID cases (C). The nuclei of Spike-positive cells appear an intense red stain and have abnormally enlarged cytoplasts (panel h) [13].
Figure 4
Figure 4 – “Histopathological evidence of alveolar damage, inflammation and SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 lungs” [13].
The cellular destruction detected in the histopathology is macroscopically reflected in the physical damage of lung tissue displayed in Figure 5.
Figure 5
Figure 5 – “Macroscopic appearance of COVID lungs” [13].
In all pathological examinations of patients that died of COVID, their lungs sustained macroscopic damage [13]. Severe cases of COVID reveal congested and firm lungs (A) with “hemorrhagic areas and loss of air spaces (a’, c’)” [13]. As the virus ravages the body, some patients rapidly deteriorate and develop severe inflammation and clotting in the lungs (B) which shows “the thrombosis of large pulmonary vessels, often with multiple thrombi and in one case determining an extensive infarction in the right lobe (Fig. 5B panels a and b)” [13]. The lung’s architecture crumbles as cells lose their integrity and continue to die, thus resulting in the development of Acute Respiratory Distress (ARDS). ARDS develops in about 5% of COVID-19 patients, and of all the infected, the mortality rate remains around 1 to 2% [14]. Autopsies are beginning to reveal that rather than a singular cause of death, many factors seem to be responsible for higher mortality rates in patients that develop critical cases of COVID-19.
The fallout from the hyperactive immune response disrupts regular oxygen diffusion from the alveoli into the capillaries and consequently to the rest of the body. This commonly leaves fluid and dead cells, resulting in pneumonia, a condition in which patients experience symptoms such as coughing, fever, and rapid or shallow breathing [14]. If oxygen levels in the blood continue to drop, patients rely on breathing assistance by a ventilator to forcefully push oxygen into damaged lungs “riddled with white opacities where black space—air—should be” [14]. The presence of opacities in the lungs indicate the development of pneumonia into ARDS, which was found in the autopsy of a 77-year-old man with a history of comorbidities, including hypertension and the removal of his spleen (splenectomy) [15]. The decedent exhibited chills and an intermittent fever but no cough for 6 days. On March 20, 2020, emergency medical services responded to a call, stating that the deceased was experiencing weakness, fever, and shortness of breath. In route to the hospital, the decedent went into cardiac arrest and died shortly after reaching the hospital [15]. A postmortem nasopharyngeal swab was administered and came back positive for SARS-CoV-2.
Figure 6 |
Figure 7 |
Figure 6 – Normal chest X-Ray of healthy lungs [16]. | Figure 7 – “Lesion segmentation results of three COVID-19 cases displayed using the software post-processing platform” [17]. |
Figure 7 shows opacities in the CT “of typical COVID-19 infection cases at three different infection stages: the early stage, progressive stage, and severe stage” [17]. Figure 7 highlights these opacities in red, which appear to intensify and cover more of the lung CT as the virus increases in severity (a-c). Patient 4 (c) exhibits what medical examiners refer to as a “complete whiteout” of the lungs. Indicating reduced air flow, whereas the normal scan of healthy lungs (Figure 6) has a black background, representing the transparency of free and unrestricted airflow.
The postmortem radiography of the deceased 77-year-old man showed “Diffuse, dense bilateral airspace consolidations (complete “whiteout”)” [15]. In most cases of severe COVID-19 “the greatest severity of CT findings is visible around day 10 after the symptom onset. Acute respiratory distress syndrome is the most common indication for transferring patients with COVID-19 to the ICU” [18].
ARDS in connection to SARS-CoV-2 was first documented in Wuhan, Hubei, China in December 2019 with over 90,000 deaths associated with organ dysfunction, particularly progressive respiratory failure and the formation of blood clots resulting in the highest mortality rates [19]. Another autopsy from Hamburg, Germany conducted on the first 12 documented consecutive cases of COVID-19 related deaths revealed that there was not only profuse alveolar damage in 8 out of the 12 patients but also a high rate of clotting resulting in death. 75% of patients that died were males within an age range of 52 to 87 years and 7 out of 12 patients autopsied (58%) presented venous thromboembolism, as displayed in Figure 7. A pulmonary embolism was the direct cause of death in 4 of the deceased [20].
Figure 8
Figure 8 – “Macroscopic autopsy findings: A. Patchy aspect of the lung surface (case 1). B. Cutting surface of the lung in case 4. C. Pulmonary embolism (case 3). D. Deep venous thrombosis (case 5)” [20].
The formation of clots results in pulmonary vasoconstriction, or the constriction of arteries and halting of blood delivery to the arteries and capillaries in the lungs. Blood cannot travel to the lungs, so oxygen levels drop. As a result, a cytokine storm from our hyperactive immune system occurs, destroying the alveolus and the endothelium and causing clots to form. Smaller clots come together and form a fatal giant blood clot, or the clots can break apart and travel to other parts of the body, causing a blockage and inadequate blood supply to organs or other parts of the body [19]. If the blood supply to fingers, toes, and other extremities is cut off by a clot, it is referred to as ischemia and often results in the amputation of digits and appendages once the flesh begins to die [19].
When SARS-CoV-2 enters the alveolar cells in the lungs via the ACE2 receptors, it can directly attack organs and indirectly cause damage to other organs by triggering a hyperactive immune response (cytokine storm). When the viral particles trigger a cytokine storm, they cause further inflammation of the lungs resulting in plummeting oxygen levels and the formation of blood clots in the arteries (arterial thrombosis).
Conclusion
SARS-CoV-2 is a multi-organ scourge, but it primarily attacks the lung by first attaching its spike protein to the host cell’s ACE2 receptors. This prevents the lungs from regulating their function because it inhibits ANG II protein breakdown, causing increased alveolar damage and inflammation of the lungs. The virion proteins create proinflammatory responses in the innate immune response and compromise an effective adaptive immune response. As the virus progresses the number of neutrophils from the innate immune response increase while the number of helpful lymphocytes (T-cells and B-cells) decrease. The ACE2 receptors overstimulate the innate and adaptive immune response to produce more proinflammatory molecules to eliminate the virus, thus causing more destruction to the body and its immune response. Autopsies of COVID-19 victims show ongoing cellular death and collapse of the respiratory system caused by inflammation and alveolar damage that eventually develop into ARDS. Extreme inflammation induced by the immune response causes difficulties in breathing and clotting in the lungs. Radiography of progressive stages of COVID identify opacities in lung CTs indicating obstructed airways and alveolar deterioration. Postmortem examinations reveal gross destruction of the lung tissue, such as pulmonary artery thrombosis, vasoconstriction, lung infarction, or pulmonary embolism. Progressive organ and respiratory failure and abnormal clotting are all contributing factors to the cause of death in the most severe cases of COVID-19.
SARS-CoV-2 efficiently exploits weaknesses not only within our innate and adaptive immune systems across sex, age, race, and ethnicity, but it also exploits weaknesses within our societies. The etymological origins of Pandemic are rooted in pandēmos , which is Greek for ‘all’ (pan)+ ‘people’ (demos). When simplified, pandemic literally means “all people” but the priorities of leadership across the world reveal that not all people suffer the burden of this pandemic equally. Regarding the United States’ approach to the pandemic, this quote from the Atlantic’s article “Why Some People Get Sicker Than Others” is sufficient; “the damage of disease and a global pandemic is not a mystery. Often, it’s a matter of what societies choose to tolerate. America has empty hotels while people sleep in parking lots. Food is destroyed every day while people go hungry. Americans are forced to endure the physiological stresses of financial catastrophe while corporations are bailed out. With the coronavirus, we do not have vulnerable populations so much as we have vulnerabilities as a population. Our immune system is not strong” [21].
References:
1. Fan, Jingchun, Xiaodong Liu, Weimin Pan, Mark W. Douglas, and Shisan Bao. “Epidemiology of Coronavirus Disease in Gansu Province, China, 2020.” Emerging Infectious Diseases 26, no. 6 (2020): 1257-265. doi:10.3201/eid2606.200251.
2. Stokes, Erin K., Laura D. Zambrano, Kayla N. Anderson, Ellyn P. Marder, Kala M. Raz, Suad El Burai Felix, Yunfeng Tie, and Kathleen E. Fullerton. “Coronavirus Disease 2019 Case Surveillance — United States, January 22–May 30, 2020.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 69, no. 24 (2020): 759-65. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6924e2.
3. Wiersinga, W. Joost, Andrew Rhodes, Allen C. Cheng, Sharon J. Peacock, and Hallie C. Prescott. “Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).” Jama 324, no. 8 (2020): 782. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.12839.
4. “Naming the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and the Virus That Causes It.” World Health Organization. Accessed May 31, 2021. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it.
5. “How The Body Reacts To Viruses – HMX: Harvard Medical School.” HMX | Harvard Medical School. February 19, 2021. Accessed May 31, 2021. https://onlinelearning.hms.harvard.edu/hmx/immunity/.
6. Drexler, Madeline. What You Need to Know about Infectious Disease. Washington, D.C., WA: National Academies Press, 2010.
7. Yuki, Koichi, Miho Fujiogi, and Sophia Koutsogiannaki. “COVID-19 Pathophysiology: A Review.” Clinical Immunology 215 (2020): 108427. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2020.108427.
8. “Image Library.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. February 10, 2020. Accessed May 31, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/media/subtopic/images.htm.
9. Yazdanpanah, Fereshteh, Michael R. Hamblin, and Nima Rezaei. “The Immune System and COVID-19: Friend or Foe?” Life Sciences 256 (2020): 117900. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117900.
10. Lee, Amanda J., and Ali A. Ashkar. “The Dual Nature of Type I and Type II Interferons.” Frontiers in Immunology 9 (2018). doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02061.
11. Scully, Eileen P., Jenna Haverfield, Rebecca L. Ursin, Cara Tannenbaum, and Sabra L. Klein. “Considering How Biological Sex Impacts Immune Responses and COVID-19 Outcomes.” Nature Reviews Immunology 20, no. 7 (2020): 442-47. doi:10.1038/s41577-020-0348-8.
12. Cornell, Brent. “Lung Tissue.” BioNinja. 2016. Accessed May 31, 2021. https://ib.bioninja.com.au/options/option-d-human-physiology/d6-transport-of-respiratory/lung-tissue.html.
13. Bussani, Rossana, Edoardo Schneider, Lorena Zentilin, Chiara Collesi, Hashim Ali, Luca Braga, Maria Concetta Volpe, Andrea Colliva, Fabrizio Zanconati, Giorgio Berlot, Furio Silvestri, Serena Zacchigna, and Mauro Giacca. “Persistence of Viral RNA, Pneumocyte Syncytia and Thrombosis Are Hallmarks of Advanced COVID-19 Pathology.” EBioMedicine 61 (2020): 103104. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103104.
14. Wadman, Meredith. “How Does Coronavirus Kill? Clinicians Trace a Ferocious Rampage through the Body, from Brain to Toes.” Science, 2020. doi:10.1126/science.abc3208.
15. Barton, Lisa M., Eric J. Duval, Edana Stroberg, Subha Ghosh, and Sanjay Mukhopadhyay. “COVID-19 Autopsies, Oklahoma, USA.” American Journal of Clinical Pathology 153, no. 6 (2020): 725-33. doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqaa062.
16. Gaillard, Frank. “Normal Chest X-ray: Radiology Case.” Radiopaedia Blog RSS. Accessed May 31, 2021. https://radiopaedia.org/cases/normal-chest-x-ray?lang=us.Case courtesy of Assoc Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 8304
17. Wang, Xingrui, Qinglin Che, Xiaoxiao Ji, Xinyi Meng, Lang Zhang, Rongrong Jia, Hairong Lyu, Weixian Bai, Lingjie Tan, and Yanjun Gao. “Correlation between Lung Infection Severity and Clinical Laboratory Indicators in Patients with COVID-19: A Cross-sectional Study Based on Machine Learning.” BMC Infectious Diseases 21, no. 1 (2021). doi:10.1186/s12879-021-05839-9.
18. Salehi, Sana, Aidin Abedi, Sudheer Balakrishnan, and Ali Gholamrezanezhad. “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review of Imaging Findings in 919 Patients.” American Journal of Roentgenology 215, no. 1 (2020): 87-93. doi:10.2214/ajr.20.23034.
19. Magro, Cynthia, J. Justin Mulvey, David Berlin, Gerard Nuovo, Steven Salvatore, Joanna Harp, Amelia Baxter-Stoltzfus, and Jeffrey Laurence. “Complement Associated Microvascular Injury and Thrombosis in the Pathogenesis of Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Report of Five Cases.” Translational Research 220 (2020): 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.007.
20. Wichmann, Dominic, Jan-Peter Sperhake, Marc Lütgehetmann, Stefan Steurer, Carolin Edler, Axel Heinemann, Fabian Heinrich, Herbert Mushumba, Inga Kniep, Ann Sophie Schröder, Christoph Burdelski, Geraldine De Heer, Axel Nierhaus, Daniel Frings, Susanne Pfefferle, Heinrich Becker, Hanns Bredereke-Wiedling, Andreas De Weerth, Hans-Richard Paschen, Sara Sheikhzadeh-Eggers, Axel Stang, Stefan Schmiedel, Carsten Bokemeyer, Marylyn M. Addo, Martin Aepfelbacher, Klaus Püschel, and Stefan Kluge. “Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19.” Annals of Internal Medicine 173, no. 4 (2020): 268-77. doi:10.7326/m20-2003.
21. Hamblin, James. “Why Some People Get Sicker Than Others.” The Atlantic. August 19, 2020. Accessed May 31, 2021. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/04/coronavirus-immune-response/610228/.
A Neuroimmunological Approach to Understanding SARS-CoV-2
By Parmida Pajouhesh, Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior ‘23
Author’s Note: The Coronavirus Disease has undoubtedly affected us in many sectors of our lives. There has been a lot of discussion surrounding the respiratory symptoms induced by the disease but less focus on how contracting the disease can result in long-term suffering. As someone who is fascinated by the brain, I wanted to investigate how COVID-19 survivors have been neurologically impacted post-recovery and what insight it can provide on more severe neurological disorders.
The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) has drastically changed our lives over the past fifteen months. The viral disease produces mild to severe symptoms, including fever, chills, and nausea. There are individual differences in the length of recovery, typically ranging from 1-2 weeks after contraction [1]. Once recovered, those infected are assumed to be healthy and “back to normal,” but data shows that this is not the case for some COVID-19 survivors. COVID-19 has resulted in more severe long-term effects for patients, greatly affecting their ability to perform daily tasks. Taking a deeper look into the neuroimmunological side effects of COVID-19 can help explain the long-term symptoms experienced by survivors.
Developing our knowledge of long-term neurological effects on COVID-19 survivors is crucial in understanding the risk of cognitive impairments, including dementia and Alzheimer’s disease [2].
A team led by Dr. Alessandro Padovani at the University of Brescia recruited COVID-19 survivors with no previous neurological disease or cognitive impairment for check-ins six months after infection [3]. The exam assessed motor and sensory cranial nerves and global cognitive function. The results showed that the most prominent symptoms were fatigue, memory complaints, and sleep disorder. Notably, these symptoms were reported much more frequently in patients who were older in age and hospitalized for a longer period of time [3].
Other symptoms reported include “brain fog,” a loss of taste or smell, and brain inflammation [2]. Researchers hypothesize that the virus does not necessarily need to make its way inside neurons to result in “brain fog” but instead claim that it is an attack on the sensory neurons, the nerves that extend from the spinal cord throughout the body to gather information from the external environment. When the virus hijacks nociceptors, neurons that are specifically responsible for sensing pain, symptoms like brain fog can follow [4].
Theodore Price, a neuroscientist at the University of Texas at Dallas, investigated the relationship between nociceptors and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a protein embedded in cell membranes that allows for viral entry when the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 binds to it [4, 5]. The nociceptors live in clusters around the spinal cord, which are called dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Price determined that a set of DRG neurons did contain ACE2, enabling the virus to enter the cells. The DRG neurons that contained ACE2 had messenger RNA for the sensory protein MRGPRD, which marks neurons with axons concentrated at the skin, inner organs and lungs. If sensory neurons are infected with the virus, it can result in long-term consequences. It might not be the case that the virus is directly entering the brain and infecting the sensory neurons. Alternatively, it is the immune response triggering an effect on the brain, which leads to the breakdown of the blood-brain barrier surrounding the brain [6]. While this area of research is still under investigation, studies have shown that the breakdown of the blood-brain barrier and lack of oxygen to the brain are hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. Scientists are tracking global function to further understand the impact of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines on these neurological disorders.
Understanding whether the cause of neurological symptoms is viral brain infection or immune activity is important to clinicians who provide intensive care and prescribe treatments [2, 6]. With future studies, researchers plan to further examine the causes of these symptoms. This knowledge will hopefully provide COVID-19 survivors with adequate support to combat these difficulties and reduce their risk of developing a more severe neurological disorder in the future.
References :
- Sissons, Beth. 2021. “What to Know about Long COVID.” Medical News Today. www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/long-covid#diagnosis
- Rocheleau, Jackie. 2021. “Researchers Are Tracking Covid-19’s Long-Term Effects On Brain Health.” Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/jackierocheleau/2021/01/29/researchers-are-tracking-covid-19s-long-term-effects-on-brain-health/?sh=59a0bb284303
- George, Judy. 2021. “Long-Term Neurologic Symptoms Emerge in COVID-19.” MedPage Today. www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90587
- Sutherland, Stephani. 2020. “What We Know So Far about How COVID Affects the Nervous System.” Scientific American. www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-we-know-so-far-about-how-covid-affects-the-nervous-system
- Erausquin, Gabriel A et al. 2021. “The Chronic Neuropsychiatric Sequelae of COVID‐19: The Need for a Prospective Study of Viral Impact on Brain Functioning.” Alzheimer’s & Dementia. Crossref, doi:10.1002/alz.12255
- Marshall, Michael. 2020. “How COVID-19 Can Damage the Brain.” Nature. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02599-5?error=cookies_not_supported&code=5b856480-d7e8-4a22-9353-9000e12a8962
The Human-Animal Interface: Exploring the Origin, Present, and Future of COVID-19
By Tammie Tam, Microbiology ‘22
Author’s Note: Since taking the class One Health Fundamentals (PMI 129Y), I have been acutely aware of this One Health idea that the health of humankind is deeply intertwined with the health of animals and our planet. This COVID-19 pandemic has been a perfect model as a One Health issue. Through this article, I hope to introduce readers to a fuller perspective of COVID-19 as a zoonotic disease.
The COVID-19 pandemic has escalated into a human tragedy, measured daily by an increasing number of infection cases and a piling death toll. Yet, to understand the current and future risks of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, one must account for the virus’s relationship with animals in the context of its zoonotic nature, as the transmission between animals and humans is often overlooked. Uncovering the range of intermediary hosts of the virus may provide clues to the virus’s origin, point to potential reservoirs for a mutating virus, and help inform future public health policies. As a result, a small but growing body of researchers is working to predict and confirm potential human-animal transmission models.
The origin of the SARS-CoV-2
Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) and other disease detectives are still working to unravel the complete origin of the virus. Scientists have narrowed down the primary animal reservoir for the virus through viral genomic analysis, between strains of human and animal coronaviruses [1]. They suspect bats to be the most likely primary source of the virus because the SARS-CoV-2 strain is a 96.2 percent match for a bat coronavirus, bat-nCoV RaTG13 [1]. Despite the close match, the differences in key surface proteins between the two viruses are distinct enough to suggest that the bat coronavirus had to have undergone mutations through one or more intermediary hosts in order to infect humans [2].
To identify potential intermediate hosts, scientists are examining coronaviruses specific to different animal species [1]. If SARS-CoV-2 is genetically similar to another animal-specific coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 may also possess similar viral proteins to the animal-specific coronaviruses. With similar proteins, similar host-virus interactions can theoretically take place, allowing for SARS-CoV-2 to infect the animal in question. For example, besides bats, a pangolin coronavirus, pangolin-nCoV, has the second highest genetic similarity to SARS-CoV-2, which positions the pangolin as a possible intermediate host [3]. Because of the similarity, viral proteins of the pangolin coronavirus can interact with shared key host proteins in humans just as strongly as in pangolin [4]. However, more epidemiological research is needed to determine whether a pangolin had contracted coronavirus from a human or a human had contracted coronavirus from a pangolin. Alternatively, the intermediate host could have been another animal, but there are still no clear leads [1].
What it takes to be a host for SARS-CoV-2
In any viable host, the SARS-CoV-2 virus operates by sneaking past immune defenses, forcing its way into cells, and co-opting the cell’s machinery for viral replication [5]. Along the way, the virus may acquire mutations—some deadly and some harmless. Eventually, the virus has propagated in a high enough quantity to jump from its current host to the next [5].
Most importantly for the virus to infect a host properly, the virus must recognize the entranceway into cells quickly enough before the host immune system catches on to the intruder and mounts an attack [5]. SARS-CoV-2’s key into the cell is through its spike glycoproteins found on the outer envelope of the virus. Once the spike glycoproteins interact with an appropriate angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor found on the host cell surfaces, the virus blocks the regular functions of the ACE2 receptor, such as regulating blood pressure and local inflammation [6,7]. At the same time, the interaction triggers the cell to take in the virus [5].
Since the gene encoding for the ACE2 receptor is relatively similar among humans, the virus can travel and infect the human population easily. Likewise, most animals closely related to humans like great apes possess a similar ACE2 receptor in terms of structure and function, which allows SARS-CoV-2 a path to hijack the cells of certain non-human animals [8]. Despite the overall similar structure and function, the ACE2 receptor varies between animal species at key interaction sites with the spike glycoproteins due to natural mutations that are kept to make the ACE2 receptor the most efficient in the respective animal. Thus, while there are other proteins involved in viral entry into the host cells, the ACE2 receptor is the one that varies between animals and most likely modulates susceptibility to COVID-19 [9].
As a result, scientists are particularly interested in the binding of the ACE2 receptor with the viral spike glycoprotein because of its implications for an organism’s susceptibility to COVID-19. Dr. Xuesen Zhao and their team from Capital Medical University examined the sequence identities and interaction patterns of the binding site between ACE2 receptors of different animals and the spike glycoproteins of the SARS-CoV-2 [10]. They reasoned that the more similar the ACE2 receptor of an animal is to humans, the more likely the virus could infect the animal. For example, they found ACE2 receptors of rhesus monkeys, a closely related primate, had similar interaction patterns as humans [10]. Meanwhile, they found rats and mice to have dissimilar ACE2 receptors and poor viral entry [10].
While entrance into the cell is a major part of infection, there are other factors to also consider, such as the ability for viral replication to subsequently take place [11]. With so many different organisms on the planet, the models simply provide a direction for where to look next. SARS-CoV-2 is unable to replicate efficiently in certain animals despite having the entrance key to get in. For example, the virus is able to replicate well in ferrets and cats, making them susceptible to the virus [12]. In dogs, the virus can only weakly replicate. Meanwhile in pigs, chickens, and ducks, the virus is unable to replicate [12]. Outside of the laboratory, confirmed cases in animals include farm animals such as minks; zoo animals such as gorillas, tigers, lions, and snow leopards; and domestic animals such as cats and dogs [13].
The future for SARS-CoV-2
Due to the multitude of intermediary hosts, COVID-19 is unlikely to disappear for good even if every person is vaccinated [14]. Viral spillover from human to animal can spill back to humans. Often, as the virus travels through a new animal population, the virus population will be subjected to slightly different pressures and selected for mutations that will confer a favorable advantage for virus survival and transmission within the current host population [15]. Sometimes, this could make the virus weaker in humans. However, there are times when the virus becomes more virulent and dangerous to humans if it spills back over from the animal reservoir [15]. Consequently, it is important to understand the full range of hosts in order to put in place preventative measures against viral spillover.
As of now, most of the known susceptible animals usually do not get severely sick with some known exceptions like minks [1]. Nevertheless, people must take precautions when interacting with animals, since research into this area is still developing and there are many unknown factors involved. This is especially important for endangered species to not become sick, because they already face other threats that make them vulnerable to extinction [8]. As a result, some researchers are taking it into their own hands to keep certain animals safe. For example, after the San Diego Zoo’s resident gorillas contracted COVID-19 in January, the zoo proactively began using the experimental Zoetis vaccine to vaccinate their orangutans and bonobos, which are great apes that are considered closely related to humans and susceptible to COVID-19 [16]. Due to an assumed COVID-19 immunity in the gorillas and a limited supply of the Zoetis vaccines, they decided to not vaccinate the gorillas [16]. Now, scientists are trying to modify the Zoetis vaccine for minks, because minks are very susceptible to severe symptoms from COVID-19 and have shown to be able to transmit the virus back to humans [17].
Besides the virus mutating into different variants through basic genetic mutations, people must be cautious of potential new coronaviruses which can infect humans [18]. The human population has encountered other novel coronaviruses over the past several years, so it is not out of the question. In animals, if two coronaviruses of a human and an animal infect the same animal host, it could cause a recombination event and create a new hybrid coronavirus [19].
For the SARS-CoV-2 virus, Dr. Maya Wardeh and their team at the University of Liverpool found over 100 possible host species where recombination events could take place [18]. These hosts are animals who can contract two or more coronaviruses with one of them being the SARS-CoV-2 virus. For instance, the lesser Asiatic yellow bat, a well-known host of several coronaviruses, is predicted to be one of these recombination hosts [18]. Also, species closer to home such as the domestic cat is another possible recombination host [18]. While it will take many different rare events, from co-infection to human interaction with the particular animal for recombination to be possible, scientists are on the lookout.
Even without a full picture, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) understands the potential risks of animal reservoirs and advises COVID-19-infected patients to stay away from animals—wildlife or domestic—to prevent spillover [20]. COVID-19 has also brought to light zoonotic disease risks from illegal animal trades and wet markets. Once research into the human-animal transmission model becomes more well-developed, public health officials will have a clearer picture as to how the pandemic spiraled to its current state and help develop policies to prevent it from happening again.
References:
- Zhao J, Cui W, Tian BP. 2020. The Potential Intermediate Hosts for SARS-CoV-2. Frontiers in Microbiology 11 (September): 580137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.580137.
- Friend T, Stebbing J. 2021. What Is the Intermediate Host Species of SARS-CoV-2? Future Virology 16 (3): 153–56. https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2020-0390.
- Lam TT, Jia N, Zhang YW, Shum MH, Jiang JF, Zhu HC, Tong YG, et al. 2020. Identifying SARS-CoV-2-Related Coronaviruses in Malayan Pangolins. Nature 583 (7815): 282–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2169-0.
- Wrobel AG, Benton DJ, Xu P, Calder LJ, Borg A, Roustan C, Martin SR, Rosenthal PB, Skehel JJ, Gamblin SJ. 2021. Structure and Binding Properties of Pangolin-CoV Spike Glycoprotein Inform the Evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Communications 12 (1): 837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21006-9.
- Harrison AG, Lin T, Wang P. 2020. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission and Pathogenesis. Trends in Immunology 41 (12): 1100–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2020.10.004.
- Hamming I, Cooper ME, Haagmans BL, Hooper NM,Korstanje R, Osterhaus ADME, Timens W, Turner AJ, Navis G, van Goor H. 2007. The Emerging Role of ACE2 in Physiology and Disease. The Journal of Pathology 212 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2162.
- Sriram K, Insel PA. 2020. A Hypothesis for Pathobiology and Treatment of COVID‐19 : The Centrality of ACE1 / ACE2 Imbalance. British Journal of Pharmacology 177 (21): 4825–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15082.
- Melin AD, Janiak MC, Marrone F, Arora PS, Higham JP. 2020. Comparative ACE2 Variation and Primate COVID-19 Risk. Communications Biology 3 (1): 641. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01370-w.
- Brooke GN, Prischi F. 2020. Structural and Functional Modelling of SARS-CoV-2 Entry in Animal Models. Scientific Reports 10 (1): 15917. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72528-z.
- Zhao X, Chen D, Szabla R, Zheng M, Li G, Du P, Zheng S, et al. 2020. Broad and Differential Animal Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Receptor Usage by SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Virology 94 (18). https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00940-20.
- Manjarrez-Zavala MA, Rosete-Olvera DP, Gutiérrez-González LH, Ocadiz-Delgado R, Cabello-Gutiérrez C. 2013. Pathogenesis of Viral Respiratory Infection. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/54287.
- Shi J, Wen Z, Zhong G, Yang H, Wang C, Huang B, Liu R, et al. 2020. Susceptibility of Ferrets, Cats, Dogs, and Other Domesticated Animals to SARS–Coronavirus 2. Science 368 (6494): 1016–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7015.
- Quammen D. And Then the Gorillas Started Coughing. The New York Times. Accessed February 19, 2021. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/19/opinion/covid-symptoms-gorillas.html.
- Phillips N. 2021. The Coronavirus Is Here to Stay — Here’s What That Means. Nature 590 (7846): 382–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00396-2.
- Geoghegan JL, Holmes EC. 2018. The Phylogenomics of Evolving Virus Virulence. Nature Reviews Genetics 19 (12): 756–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0055-5.
- Chan S, Andrew S. 2021. Great Apes at the San Diego Zoo Receive a Covid-19 Vaccine for Animals. CNN. Accessed March 5, 2021. Available from: https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/05/us/great-apes-coronavirus-vaccine-san-diego-zoo-trnd/index.html.
- Greenfield P. 2021. Covid Vaccine Used on Apes at San Diego Zoo Trialled on Mink. The Guardian.Accessed March 23, 2021. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/mar/23/covid-vaccine-used-great-apes-san-diego-zoo-trialled-mink.
- Wardeh M, Baylis M, Blagrove MSC. 2021. Predicting Mammalian Hosts in Which Novel Coronaviruses Can Be Generated. Nature Communications 12 (1): 780. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21034-5.
- Pérez-Losada M, Arenas M, Galán JC, Palero F, González-Candelas F. 2015. Recombination in Viruses: Mechanisms, Methods of Study, and Evolutionary Consequences. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 30 (March): 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2014.12.022.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. COVID-19 and Your Health. Accessed February 11, 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/animals.html.